← Back to Lens Explorer

Compare Rack

Cooke Anamorphic/i SF vs Atlas Mercury Anamorphic

Use this view to separate emotional image language from practical package fit. The goal is not to find the objectively best lens. It is to find the family whose tradeoffs match the job.

Texture Lane

Cooke Anamorphic/i SF leans further into expressive texture, while Atlas Mercury Anamorphic keeps a tighter image signature.

Focus Discipline

Atlas Mercury Anamorphic is the safer pick when repeatability, focus behavior, or cleanup discipline matter more.

Package Move

Use discovery when the optical answer is clear but the actual Texas package, sourcing path, or budget tradeoff still needs to be solved.

Spec Rail

Focal Range

32mm-180mm

36mm-95mm

Speed

T2.3-T2.9

T2.2

Coverage

Super 35, Full Frame

Super 35, Full Frame, VistaVision

Price Tier

Elite

Premium

Cooke

Cooke Anamorphic/i SF

Cooke's premium full-frame anamorphic answer: warm skin, front-anamorphic depth cues, and Special Flair coatings that add blue streaks without total chaos.

Ask GLM about sourcing

Focal Range

32mm-180mm

Speed

T2.3-T2.9

Coverage

Super 35, Full Frame

Price Tier

Elite

Character

High

80

Flare

High

84

Contrast

Balanced

46

Warmth

Forward

76

Focus Control

Forward

60

Distortion Control

Forward

64

Best For

  • Premium narrative anamorphic
  • Digital sensors that need warmth and flare behavior
  • Projects wanting anamorphic scope without losing control

Core Tradeoffs

  • Still expensive and specialist
  • Not as unruly as vintage anamorphic families if that's the goal
Open full profile →

Atlas

Atlas Mercury Anamorphic

A compact 1.5x full-frame anamorphic set with golden flares, vintage-leaning warmth, and a footprint small enough for modern support packages.

Ask GLM about sourcing

Focal Range

36mm-95mm

Speed

T2.2

Coverage

Super 35, Full Frame, VistaVision

Price Tier

Premium

Character

Forward

72

Flare

Forward

74

Contrast

Balanced

50

Warmth

Balanced

58

Focus Control

Forward

68

Distortion Control

Forward

70

Best For

  • Gimbal or handheld anamorphic
  • Full-frame productions needing compact packages
  • Lower-footprint commercial work

Core Tradeoffs

  • 1.5x squeeze is a different flavor than 2x classics
  • Less raw imperfection than older anamorphics
Open full profile →